Classically, the only proper functions of government are 1) to provide security from outside threats, 2) to administer justice and 3) to secure individual rights. A more recent development has been the general acknowledgment that government also has a significant role with respect to infrastructure such as road, airports and utilities.
Of course, our government has gone far beyond these well-defined limits and has inserted itself into virtually every aspect of our personal and economic lives. Practically everything is regulated in some manner – the rate of pay for which we may agree to work, the specifications of our homes and vehicles, the information we must be provided on food and merchandise, the types of light bulbs we can use – the list is so long it’s beyond the capacity of any one person to complete.
As frustrating as such examples are, there are circumstances in which government interference in society goes beyond such typical meddling, big brotherisms and into a nightmarish arena where the concept of who is to serve whom is turned upside down. As troublesome as they are, most government regulations are ostensibly intended for the benefit of society and the citizenry. But there is a unique class of government regulation in which the citizenry is regulated/controlled/manipulated, not for its own good, but for the good of the government.
One example is the proliferation of testing in public school systems, not to monitor the advancement of individual students, but to create, record and utilize ‘big-data’ in the service of the school systems and the governments that run them. It short, millions of students spend millions of hours doing work, not for their own benefit, but to create data for the government to use.
Even more recently, as Fildena 150 online explains in more detail, the “Commission On Evidence-Based Policymaking” was created by a bi-partisan Congress to analyze how to use data collected by governmental agencies including educational and workforce databases in order to determine how well government programs are working. It’s a classic “tale wags dog” story. Government overreach results in innumerable programs and agencies doing the unlimited work of government. In order to measure, evaluate and improve these myriad functions of government, the Commission wants ‘big data’ on citizens. A current ban prevents gathering such data but the Commission would like to see the ban lifted. It’s justification is an eerie example of how, under the guise of improving government, the citizenry can be transformed from the ‘served’ to the ‘servers’. “(B)ans on data collection and use create a serious impediment to evidence-based policymaking, and could make it difficult or impossible to hold government activity accountable.”
Get it? Our behemoth government says it needs your personal information so it can monitor itself and make itself better. So questions arise. Are there any impositions upon the citizenry which are not permissible in the interest of monitoring or improving government? If so, what are they? Are there limits upon which the people will insist? Or should privacy concerns always come second to whatever the government decides will make itself more efficient? More broadly, government is already largely unmanageable, corrupt and incompetent. Why would anyone think it is a good idea to turn over all our personal information to its great computers to be sliced, diced, examined and manipulated to God only knows what ultimate purposes? Who serves whom?