Constitutional Concerns Over Trump

Donald Trump’s brash, non-political celebrity and outspoken approach have introduced, for better or worse depending on your perspective, a new dynamic in presidential politics.  Prospective voters can choose from any number of hot button political topics and love or despise him for his position, or perhaps just as importantly, for the manner in which he articulates his positions.  While I have personally enjoyed the metaphorical thumb he intentionally and repeatedly sticks into the eye of those who insist on political correctness, I have many concerns with regard to how he might govern.  Chief among them is a concern that he doesn’t respect or understand the Constitution or its structural mechanisms which limit and disperse governmental power.

Trump made two public comments this week which perfectly illustrate the basis for my concern.  In a CNN Town Hall this past Tuesday night, Trump was asked a question from the audience regarding what he considers to be the top three functions of the federal government.  In response, he listed national security, healthcare and education, in that order.  The following day Chris Matthews asked him how he would go about banning abortions.  Trump didn’t have an answer, but the discussion led to a follow-up question regarding whether women who have an abortion should be punished, presumably through some criminal sanction.  Trump asserted that yes, “there has to be some form of punishment”.

While I fully expect a statist Democrat candidate or an establishment Republican candidate to assert that the regulation of healthcare and education are properly within the powers of the federal government, I continue to hold out hope that the Republican Party might identify and nominate a candidate who not only understands, but appreciates that the federal government has only limited and specifically enumerated constitutional powers and that they decidedly do not include the regulation of health care or education.  Though Trump ultimately stated that responsibility for education policy should be returned to the states, one gets the distinct impression that this opinion is based on something other than an understanding that the federal government has no legal authority in the education arena.  That impression is bolstered by the fact that he continues to advocate for a substantial federal role in healthcare without any apparent regard for the question of constitutional authority.

Similarly, the abortion question is simply not a policy concern for any president who is a constitutionalist.  Why?  Because the regulation of abortion is exclusively within the constitutional authority of the states.  Were Roe v. Wade overruled tomorrow, the question of abortion would return to individual state legislatures.  If a state were to outlaw abortions, it would also determine whether women and/or doctors receiving or performing illegal abortions would be subject to criminal sanctions and, if so, what those sanctions would be.  Simply, there is no constitutional role for a president in determining the legality of abortion or the penalty for violating any state law outlawing abortion.  In the media aftermath of the abortion comment, Trump has clarified his initial comments to suggest that only doctors who perform illegal abortions should be punished and not the women who receive them.  The clarification only reconfirms his misunderstanding – or disregard – of the Constitution’s limits on federal authority.

If we are ever to return the country to a condition of deep and widespread individual liberty, we must pursue constitutionalism.  The separation of powers among the federal branches and between the federal government and the states left individuals in a far better position to protect and defend liberty than the current paradigm where so much unconstitutional power is concentrated in Washington, out of reach – often even out of sight – of the populace.  The president is uniquely situated to lead the country toward constitutionalism while putting constitutionalism out front and center as a matter of public debate.  Those who cherish liberty should seek and embrace a presidential candidate who understands and appreciates the Constitution and the manner in which it distributes governing authority and should shun any who promise to wield unconstitutional power, regardless of how appealing the policies advocated by that candidate may appear.  Constitutionalism is the way to liberty in America.  Any other path holds only the empty promise of temporary policy victories while maintaining the status quo of unconstitutional power consolidated in Washington.  Any other path offers only diversion and a delay from the ultimate goal.

I’ll continue to keep an open mind with respect to Donald Trump.  I’ll wait for him to demonstrate an understanding of the Constitution and a commitment to constitutionalism.  So far, he has tended to demonstrate the opposite at most every opportunity.

Please follow and like us:

2 thoughts on “Constitutional Concerns Over Trump”

  1. Sadly. The US Constitution has been overthrown long time ago. Mostly by Democrats and Republicans but specially by the oligarchs they work for. It is my understanding that US lives in what is called an “inter regnum” as a Constitutional Convention is still pending. As far as I can see, the difference with Trump is that he call things as he see them, unlike Hillary Clinton of the Republican clowns that like to run the farce. Calling for democracy while undermining it. Calling for national security while jeopardizing it. Calling for social cohesion while imprisoning and enslaving blacks and latinos. Calling for equality while excluding everyone except their minions. Clinton and the Republican clowns can only offer the continuation of the inter regnum that wipes his ass with US Constitution, as Paul Craig Roberts describe in full length: . Truth is that Trump is imperfect, but at least he is honest and you know what can be expected. With Hillary and the Republican clowns you can expect treason and psychopathic behavior in order to benefit their themselves, the PACs and the oligarchs that finance them, regardless of human rights, nature, justice or truth.

  2. I too am concerned about several comments that Donald Trump has made. I believe that he does care for America and it’s people. But I wish that he would be more cautious and slow to speak when he is ask about important issues. I also am concerned with the lack of knowledge about our constitution nationwide. I am amazed how many people in our own country don’t even know The Pledge of Allegiance. Or even who is running for the office of president. How sad. We already have a president who ignores the constitution and the needs of the American people. We hope and pray to move forward and not fall back even further. We must not forget that God is in His place and in control. And remember that he gave us free will and we must choose wisely in who we vote into the office of the President of this great nation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *